🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Power In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and later discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.